It is common in economic downturns for the labor force to decrease or increase more slowly than usual in size as many give up on finding work and are therefore no longer counted as officially unemployed.
Conversely, during an economic recovery, high unemployment rates can persist despite an increase in jobs as more workers begin looking for work and re-enter the labor market.
Underemployment includes three groups of people: unemployed workers who are actively looking for work; involuntarily part-time workers who want full-time work but have had to settle for part-time hours; and so-called marginally-attached workers who want and are available to work, but have given up actively looking. Together, these three groups provide a more comprehensive measure of slack in the labor market. This measure does not include people who have had to settle for employment below their skill or experience level, such as the mechanical engineer who is driving a cab.
There is currently no data that track this form of underemployment. Compared to other labor force statistics, the underemployment rate is relatively new; the census only began to track underemployment as it is currently measured in The lack of historical data can make it difficult to put current numbers in context with past labor market performance.
The Employment-to-Population Ratio is a useful, broad-brush measure. It simply shows the number of people currently employed as a share of the total working-age population, which is the number of civilian, non-institutionalized persons, age 16 and over. This measure does not typically change dramatically from month to month, but even minor changes help identify which segments of the population are experiencing the most job loss or gain.
This ratio also compliments the unemployment rate in assessing the health of the labor market. The unemployment rate has shortcomings that the employment-to-population ratio does not. As mentioned above, the unemployment rate is affected by the size of the labor force.
As the labor market falters, the unemployment rate may actually fall if workers give up looking for work, and as the labor market is recovering, unemployment can rise because more people are entering the labor force as they start to look for work again. The employment-to-population ratio, because it is unaffected by voluntary changes in labor force participation, is a useful indicator of current labor market conditions. Lows in the employment-to- population ratio correspond with economic downturns.
The employment-to-population ratio holds clear and discernible implications for the labor market, both among and between segments of the population. The Labor Force Participation Rate shows the number of people in the labor force—defined as the sum of employed and unemployed persons—as a share of the total working-age population, which is the number of civilian, non-institutionalized people, age 16 and over.
It is similar to the employment-to-population ratio but different in one important aspect: it includes the numbers of people with a job as well as the number actively looking for work.
Month-to-month changes in the employed and unemployed in the labor force are relatively small compared to the size of the entire working-age population.
Although minor changes in the labor force participation rate can be informative, it is often used to study long-term trends among different segments of the population. Comparing different segments of the population helps show where the labor market succeeds or fails in incorporating the working-age population.
Administrative records such as employment office records and social insurance statistics can also serve as sources of unemployment statistics. Although statistics on registered unemployment might be useful, they are in no way comparable to the unemployment statistics derived from household surveys following the three-criteria definition persons not employed, available for work and looking for work. A national count of either unemployed persons or work applicants that are registered at employment offices is likely to be only a limited subset of the total number of unemployed, especially in countries where the system of employment offices is not extensive.
This may be because of eligibility requirements that exclude those who have never worked or have not worked recently, or to other impediments to registration. Administrative records can sometimes overstate registered unemployment because of double-counting, failure to remove people from the registers when they are no longer looking for a job, or because it allows inclusion of persons who have done some work during the reference period.
Even though in most developed countries the unemployment rate continues to prove its usefulness as an important indicator of labour market performance, and specifically, as a key measure of labour underutilization, in many developing countries, the significance and meaning of the unemployment rate could be questioned. In the absence of unemployment insurance systems or social safety nets, persons of working age must avoid unemployment, resorting to engaging in some form of economic activity, however insignificant or inadequate.
Thus, in this context, other measures should supplement the unemployment rate to comprehensively assess labour underutilization, such as time-related underemployment and potential labour force indicators.
Regarding the international comparability of unemployment rates, there are a host of reasons why the statistics may not be comparable between countries. In other words, differences in the measurement tool can affect the comparability of results across countries. Also, national statistical offices, even when basing themselves on the ILO conceptual guidelines, may not follow the strictest measurement of employment and unemployment.
They may differ in their choices concerning the conceptual basis for estimating unemployment. They may also choose to derive the unemployment rate from the civilian labour force rather than the total labour force.
Among other things, a considerable degree of seasonality can influence the results when the full year is not covered.
The geographic coverage of the underlying survey or other data source also has an impact on the comparability of the resulting statistics. Geographic coverage limitations — urban areas, city, regional areas only — results in obvious limitations to comparability to the extent that coverage is not representative of the country as a whole.
The overall unemployment rate for a country is a widely used measure of its unutilized labour supply. If employment is taken as the desired situation for people in the the labour force, unemployment is clearly an undesirable situation. Still, some short-term unemployment can be necessary for ensuring adjustment to economic fluctuations. Unemployment rates by specific groups, defined by age, sex, occupation or industry, are also useful in identifying groups of workers and sectors most vulnerable to joblessness.
While the unemployment rate may be considered the most informative labour market indicator, reflecting the general performance of the labour market and the economy as a whole, it should not be interpreted as a measure of economic hardship or of well-being. When based on the internationally-recommended standards, the unemployment rate simply reflects the proportion of the labour force that does not have a job but is available and actively looking for work.
It says nothing about the economic resources of unemployed workers or their family members. Its use should, therefore, be limited to serving as a measurement of the utilization of labour and an indication of the failure to find work. Other measures, including income-related indicators, would be needed to evaluate economic hardship.
An additional criticism of the aggregate unemployment measure is that it masks information on the composition of the jobless population and therefore misses out on the particularities of the education level, ethnic origin, socio-economic background, work experience, etc. Moreover, the unemployment rate says nothing about the type of unemployment — whether it is cyclical and short-term or structural and long-term — which is a critical issue for policy makers in the development of their policy responses, especially given that structural unemployment cannot be addressed by boosting market demand only.
Paradoxically, low unemployment rates may well disguise substantial poverty, as high unemployment rates can occur in countries with significant economic development and low incidence of poverty.
In countries without a safety net of unemployment insurance and welfare benefits, many individuals, despite strong family solidarity, simply cannot afford to be unemployed. The unemployment rate is seasonally adjusted to account for predictable variations, such as extra hiring during the holidays. The BLS also provides the unadjusted rate. It is not the only metric available, and measures unemployment fairly narrowly. The more comprehensive U-6 rate , often called the "real" unemployment rate, is an alternative measure of unemployment that includes groups such as discouraged workers, who have stopped looking for a new job, and the underemployed, who are working part time because they can't find full time work.
To calculate the U-3 unemployment rate, the number of unemployed people is divided by the number of people in the labor force, which consists of all employed and unemployed people. The ratio is expressed as a percentage. Many people who would like to work but cannot due to a disability, for example , or have become discouraged after looking for work without success, are not considered unemployed under this system; since they are not employed either, they are categorized as outside the labor force.
Critics see this approach as painting an unjustifiably rosy picture of the labor force. U-3 is also criticized for making no distinction between those in temporary, part-time, and full-time jobs, even in cases where part-time or temporary workers would rather work full-time but cannot due to labor market conditions.
In response to concerns that the official rate does not fully convey the health of the labor market, the BLS publishes five alternative measures: U-1, U-2, U-4, U-5, and U Though these are often referred to as unemployment rates U-6, in particular, is often called the "real" unemployment rate , U-3 is technically the only unemployment rate. The others are measures of "labor underutilization. People who have been unemployed for 15 weeks or longer, expressed as a percentage of the labor force.
People who lost their jobs, or whose temporary jobs ended, as a percentage of the labor force. Unemployed people, plus discouraged workers, as a percentage of the labor force plus discouraged workers. Discouraged workers are those who are available to work and would like a job, but have given up actively looking for one.
This category includes people who feel they lack the necessary qualifications or education, who believe there is no work available in their field, or who feel they are too young or old to find work. Those who feel unable to find work due to discrimination also fall under this category.
Note that the denominator—normally labor force—is adjusted to include discouraged workers, who are not technically part of the labor force. Unemployed people, plus those who are marginally attached to the labor force, as a percentage of the labor force plus the marginally attached. People who are marginally attached to the labor force include discouraged workers and anyone else who would like a job and has looked for one in the past 12 months but have given up actively searching.
As with U-4, the denominator is expanded to include the marginally attached, who are not technically part of the labor force.
Unemployed people, plus people who are marginally attached to the labor force, plus those who are employed part-time for economic reasons, as a percentage of the labor force plus marginally attached. This metric is the BLS's most comprehensive. In addition to the categories included in U-5, it accounts for people who have been forced to settle for part-time work even though they want to work full-time. This category is often referred to as "underemployed," although that label arguably includes full-time workers who are overqualified for their jobs.
The denominator for this ratio is the same as in U Official U. Every month the Census Bureau, part of the Department of Commerce , conducts the Current Population Survey using a sample of around 60, households, or around , individuals.
The survey collects data on individuals in these households by race, ethnicity, age, veteran status, and gender, all of which—along with geography—add nuance to the employment data. Interviews are conducted in person or by phone.
The survey excludes individuals under the age of 16 and those who are in the Armed Forces hence references to the "civilian labor force". People in correctional facilities, mental healthcare facilities, and other similar institutions are also excluded. Interviewers ask a series of questions that determine employment status, but do not ask whether respondents are employed or unemployed.
Nor do the interviewers themselves assign employment status; they record the answers for the BLS to analyze. And while men and women are not the only genders, the study graphed only looked at data for these two gender identities. Interviewers also collect information on industry, occupation, average earnings, union membership, and—for the jobless—whether they quit or were discharged fired or laid off.
In response to criticisms that the official rate paints an unjustifiably rosy picture of the health of the labor market, the BLS publishes five alternative measures: U-1, U-2, U-4, U-5, and U Though these are often referred to as unemployment rates U-6, in particular, is often called the "real" unemployment rate , U-3 is the official and the most commonly cited national unemployment rate. The others are characterized as measures of "labor underutilization.
0コメント